Centrality — who is actually central
Network influence vs. formal title. Click a row to inspect; sort by clicking any column header.
Formal rank vs. network centrality
Standardized gap = network percentile − formal-rank percentile. Positive = punches above their title; negative = title outranks real influence.
Brokerage & structural holes
Burt-style constraint (lower = more brokerage), effective size, betweenness and community-spanning reach. Highlighted nodes bridge otherwise separated groups.
Community-spanning connections
Edges that connect different detected communities — the load-bearing ties holding the org together.
Insight summary
Auto-generated, decision-ready reading of the current (filtered) network.
Department structure
Headcount, internal cohesion and outward reach per department.
Department-to-department connection strength
Sum of edge weights between departments (collaboration / advice / info / expertise). Diagonal = within-department.
Role-based network skew
Average influence by role vs. headcount share — reveals where real centrality concentrates.